The Pentagon & American Airlines Flight 77

According to officials, the explosion at the Pentagon was caused when American Airlines Flight 77, a 100 ton Boeing 757 commercial airliner, crashed at ground level into the only section of the building that was being renovated to be more "blast resistant" and which housed the fewest amount of employees in it. Flight 77 was allegedly hijacked by five Arab Islamic terrorists on an apparent suicide mission killing all 64 people on board. Officials claim the the flight recorders from Flight 77 and the remains of all but one of the 64 passengers on board where found at the crash scene.

It has been suggested that the explosion at the Pentagon could not have been caused by a Boeing 757 because of the relatively small amount of damage done to the building and surrounding area, contradictory eyewitness accounts, and from the lack of plane debris.

The photo below was taken before the roof collapsed.

Compare the damage at the Pentagon (above) to damaged caused by a missile (below).

Could a 757 flown by an amateur pilot fly at speeds of 400 m.p.h. a few feet above the ground without causing damage to the lawn and dissapear almost completely into the building?

Could the explosion have been caused by a missile and/or a small unmanned aircraft?





The Pentagon released grainy video footage of what they say is a hijacked boeing crashing into the ground floors.

Dozens of cameras in and around the Pentagon would have revealed that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon, however these videos had been confiscated and the public prohibited to view them.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

When i was in DC during the day of the attacks, i drove out to try to see the pentagon burning, we could see massive clouds of smoke, but even though we circled the building from all sides, the entire area was cordoned off for miles and miles. It would be interesting to see if there were any on the scene reporters observing the inferno.
Zj

Mr.X said...

The eyewitness accounts i've heard all vary and contradict one another. I'm not sure how credible eyewitness accounts really are. One witness claims to have seen a small corporate jet while one reporter says he saw a large american airline boeing 757. When asked why there was no damage where the wings would have struck he said it was because they bent backwards.. but i don't believe he could have seen this occur due to the large explosion (but maybe he has super human vision which allows him to see through massive balls of fire, also, the wings at wtc didn't collapse backwards when they struck a building).

Mr.X said...

I was once arrested for a vandalism crime i didn't commit (the person who commited the crime later turned himself in). Eyewitnesses pointed me out as the prime suspect. This is why I personally hesitate to believe eyewitness accounts.
While driving I often miss what is written on billboards, could someone really read the words on an unexpected billboard traveling over 400 m.p.h. then exploding?

Unknown said...

you fuckers believe anything but the truth. what a joke. if you think anything other than a 757 hit the Pentagon you are a moron! and that's a fact!