An estimated $23 billion were secretly spent for research and development on the B-2 in the early 1980s. The first B-2 wasn't publicly displayed until November 22, 1988.
Black Project
In the United States a black project is a top-secret military/defense project, unacknowledged by the government, military personnel, and/or defense contractors. Familiar examples of U.S. military aircraft developed as black projects are the F-117 stealth fighter and B-2 stealth bomber, which were highly classified and denied to exist until ready to be announced to the public.
An estimated $23 billion were secretly spent for research and development on the B-2 in the early 1980s. The first B-2 wasn't publicly displayed until November 22, 1988.
An estimated $23 billion were secretly spent for research and development on the B-2 in the early 1980s. The first B-2 wasn't publicly displayed until November 22, 1988.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I've had a long look at the video footage and the images of the plane striking the tower, and the coloration on the bottom of the plane seems to me to be nothing more than a reflection. It's like finding an image of the virgin mary in a lump of coal... you look and look, and it just starts to get clearer.
Also, you may notice in the drawing of the new AWAC-type aircraft, the extra sensor area is farther forward on the plane, also the aircraft discussed in a surveillance and communications vehicle, not a UAV.
Zj
But a reflection of what?
I was simply using the E10-MC2A as an exaple to laymans (like myself) that there are external features on the belly (as well as on top, such as an E-3 Sentry) of all kinds of newly developed aircraft. Personally I never knew this until recently when I did a little research, so I can assume that other people aren't aware of that fact either. Shit, something like that AWAC was probably just controlling a UAV that struck the tower. The anomaly could be a missle. Of course this is just my opinion so I didn't mention that for people can come to their own conclusions (like how you think it's just burned toast and not the virgin mary).
skilled technicians wouldnt need any extra attachments to make a 747 fully remote controlled. All it would take would be some changes to the cockpit of the vehicle, and some wire leads here and there that would be totally undetectable to passengers. really, you wouldnt even need to have it remote controlled, the CIA may likely have dozens of suicide/homicide bombers on their payroll that dont even know who they work for. the fact is, who orchestrated it is key, all the other stuff is simply details which only serve to be targets for a scheptic to throw darts at.
zj
good point. i've considered removing this entry because of details like that. most of my other questions and arguements are evident (or at least more so than the official explanation). what's your take on the "flashing balls of light" right before impact of both towers, just another reflection?
Post a Comment